How to use the Student Feedback Generator.
Feedback should show where the work meets the criteria and what change would improve it. Keep the student able to act on the suggestion.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Compare the work with the criteria and identify one or two changes the learner can make. Point to a specific passage or step, explaining how the revision would strengthen the response rather than only naming a weakness.
- What you provide
- Submitted work and grading rubric.
- What you get
- Constructive formative feedback tied to evidence.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Essay has a clear claim but evidence is listed without explanation.
Completed example
Keep the claim and add a sentence after each evidence point explaining how it supports the argument.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Should student feedback correct every issue at once?
Prioritize changes that best support the current learning goal. An exhaustive list can make the next action difficult to identify.
Why does the feedback tell the student what is wrong but not how to improve?
Add a revision task or question tied to the criterion. Keep the learner responsible for carrying out and evaluating the change.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑