How to use the Pitch Deck Reviewer.
Review a deck for unanswered questions and unsupported claims. A confident design cannot compensate for unclear customers, pricing or use of funds.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Review the deck as a chain of claims, checking whether each slide answers the question raised by the previous one. Flag missing evidence, unclear definitions and unsupported leaps before suggesting cosmetic changes.
- What you provide
- Deck text, target investor audience and verified company facts.
- What you get
- Narrative gaps, unsupported claims and missing evidence.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Deck claims universal demand but only describes two interviews.
Completed example
Narrow the demand claim, summarize what the interviews showed and add a plan to test willingness to pay.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Should a deck review score visual design and business evidence together?
Keep them separate. Readable slides can still contain weak claims, while strong evidence may need a clearer presentation.
Why does a traction slide appear stronger than the underlying data?
Check the denominator, period and definition of the metric. Replace broad labels with what was actually observed or contracted.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑