How to use the Debate Argument Builder.
Build the strongest reasonable opposing argument before preparing a rebuttal. Keep empirical claims separate from value judgments so the debate stays focused.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Define the motion and the standard by which it should be judged. Build a supported case, formulate a credible opposing argument and answer its strongest point without changing what the opponent claims.
- What you provide
- Motion and supplied facts.
- What you get
- Arguments, counterarguments and rebuttal structure.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Motion: the team should adopt a four-day meeting week.
Completed example
Case: protect focus time. Counterargument: urgent collaboration may suffer. Rebuttal: preserve an exception path for time-sensitive decisions.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
What belongs in a rebuttal?
Address the opposing reason or evidence directly. Explaining a trade-off is often more useful than repeating the original position.
What if the argument depends on an unsupported statistic?
Mark it as an evidence gap or replace it with a narrower supported point. Do not present an invented number as proof.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑