How to use the Amazon Listing Policy Copy Checker.
A policy review needs the actual category requirements and supporting facts. Mark a claim for substantiation rather than assuming that confident wording makes it acceptable.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Compare each listing claim with the supplied category policy and supporting product evidence. Record the phrase, applicable requirement and missing substantiation, then propose factual wording that stays within what is known.
- What you provide
- Listing text and supplied marketplace requirements.
- What you get
- Potential prohibited claims and missing substantiation.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Listing says certified sustainable, but no certification evidence is supplied.
Completed example
Claim requiring substantiation: "certified sustainable". Evidence status: no certification details supplied. Review action: obtain the relevant valid evidence and approved wording, or remove the unsupported claim from the proposed copy. This finding does not assert a specific marketplace enforcement outcome.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Does a copy review guarantee a marketplace will approve the listing?
No. The review covers supplied text and requirements. Platform checks and other listing details can affect the actual publication outcome.
Why is a certification claim being flagged despite confident wording?
Confidence is not evidence. Supply the relevant certification and applicability or remove the claim from the draft.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑