Studying and academic work

Free Research Paper Critique Generator.

Structured critique of design, evidence, limitations and support for conclusions.

Read the supplied paper sections critically and keep each assessment tied to the design and evidence actually available.

Chrome extension + account required.
25 free automation tasks/month across tools. Browser-provider limits apply.

WHAT TO HAVE READY

A supplied research paper and critical appraisal criteria.

YOUR STARTING POINT

A task you can make yours.

Copy it here. Paste it into WebAct when you are ready.

This page prepares your prompt. The task runs in WebAct.

01

Make the task yours.

Review the prompt above. Add your goal and any requirements that matter.

02

Bring it to WebAct.

Open the source page, activate WebAct and select the relevant readable content. Paste the task and provide any additional source material it requests.

03

Check the useful part.

The result covers the readable content you provide or select. Expand the relevant page sections first and check that the output includes the records you intended.

A PRACTICAL GUIDE

How to use the Research Paper Critique Generator.

A critique examines whether the design and evidence support the conclusions. Distinguish limitations from fatal flaws and avoid evaluating unseen methods.

Make the workflow fit your task.

Compare the study's question, design and evidence with its conclusions. Identify what the supplied methods can establish, distinguishing limitations that narrow interpretation from errors that undermine a particular claim.

What you provide
A supplied research paper and critical appraisal criteria.
What you get
Structured critique of design, evidence, limitations and support for conclusions.

See the input and the result.

Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run

Example input

Study summary: eight convenience-sample participants tried a tool and reported finding it helpful. No comparison group or task-completion measure. Authors conclude the tool improves productivity for all teams. Critique the inference.

Completed example

Supported observation: the eight participants reported finding the tool helpful.
Sampling limitation: a convenience sample does not establish a representative result for all teams.
Measurement limitation: reported helpfulness is not a measured productivity change.
Design limitation: no comparison is supplied to isolate the tool's effect.
Narrower conclusion: the feedback supports further investigation of perceived usefulness in a broader, appropriately designed study.
Download this example

Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.

Decisions and troubleshooting.

Does a small sample automatically make a study worthless?

Assess the study's purpose and design. A small qualitative sample may support useful observations while limiting broader prevalence or causal claims.

Why does the critique evaluate methods that were not supplied?

Mark those aspects unavailable and request the relevant section. Do not infer unreported procedures from a brief summary.

Try it with your own source.

Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.

Customize and copy the task ↑
BEFORE YOU BEGIN

Using WebAct.

The prompt and example are available here. Run your task in the WebAct Chrome extension.

Is this tool free?

You can copy and edit the prompt here for free. To use it with WebAct, install the Chrome extension, create and verify your account, and connect an available browser ChatGPT session. The Free plan includes 25 user-started automation tasks per calendar month, shared across tools. Ordinary browser Chat is separate; provider limits apply.

Learn about shared context in our privacy policy and choosing Chat or Task.

FROM A PROMPT TO YOUR OWN WORK

Bring the task to your page.

Install WebAct, add your source material and make the result yours.

Install WebAct