How to use the Email Personalization Field Checker.
Test templates with incomplete records as well as ideal ones. A fallback should read naturally without exposing raw merge-field syntax.
Make the workflow fit your task.
List the template's fields and render it against complete and incomplete sample records. Check fallback wording, punctuation and unresolved tokens, reporting the field and record responsible for each failure.
- What you provide
- Template and sample recipient records.
- What you get
- Missing merge fields and fallback suggestions.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Template: Hello {{first_name}}. Sample record has no first_name. Approved fallback greeting supplied for this illustration: Hello there.Completed example
Missing field: first_name. Fallback used: Hello there. Rendered greeting: Hello there. QA status: missing data handled using the supplied fallback; no placeholder remains visible. Other fields and the full message still need their own checks.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Should missing personal data be guessed to fill a template?
Use an approved fallback or leave the record for review. Do not invent a name, company or relationship to make the message look complete.
Why does the fallback still produce an awkward greeting?
Render the entire sentence, including spaces and punctuation. A valid replacement value can still create a broken phrase in context.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑