People management and hiring

Free Promotion Case Generator.

Evidence-mapped promotion justification.

Organize a promotion case from documented work and make the evidence gaps clear before the responsible people review it.

Chrome extension + account required.
25 free automation tasks/month across tools. Browser-provider limits apply.

WHAT TO HAVE READY

Role expectations and documented achievements.

YOUR STARTING POINT

A task you can make yours.

Copy it here. Paste it into WebAct when you are ready.

This page prepares your prompt. The task runs in WebAct.

01

Make the task yours.

Review the prompt above. Add your goal and any requirements that matter.

02

Bring it to WebAct.

Open WebAct, paste the task and provide your source material. Start in Chat for a draft or explanation; use Task when you want an approved browser action or file.

03

Check the useful part.

Use the result as an editable draft or analysis. Check it against the supplied facts and your intended audience before relying on it or sharing it.

A PRACTICAL GUIDE

How to use the Promotion Case Generator.

A promotion case should compare demonstrated work with the next role's requirements. Tenure or enthusiasm alone does not establish readiness.

Make the workflow fit your task.

Compare documented contributions with the expectations of the proposed role. Map evidence to each requirement and identify responsibilities still needing demonstration, keeping the case separate from an automatic promotion decision.

What you provide
Role expectations and documented achievements.
What you get
Evidence-mapped promotion justification.

See the input and the result.

Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run

Example input

Promotion criterion: independent project ownership. Evidence: employee led two documented projects, each with scope and delivery decisions. No evidence supplied for budget ownership, another next-role requirement.

Completed example

Criterion: independent project ownership. Evidence: two documented projects with scope and delivery decisions; review those records against the role's expected level of autonomy.
Criterion: budget ownership. Evidence: not supplied; remains unassessed.
Case summary: the project records support discussion of ownership readiness, while budget responsibility needs additional evidence before a complete role comparison.
Download this example

Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.

Decisions and troubleshooting.

Is time in the current role enough to establish promotion readiness?

Use demonstrated work against the next role's requirements. Tenure can provide context but does not substitute for relevant evidence.

Why does the case contain strong praise but little role evidence?

Replace broad endorsements with specific ownership, decisions and outcomes linked to the criteria being evaluated.

Try it with your own source.

Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.

Customize and copy the task ↑
BEFORE YOU BEGIN

Using WebAct.

The prompt and example are available here. Run your task in the WebAct Chrome extension.

Is this tool free?

You can copy and edit the prompt here for free. To use it with WebAct, install the Chrome extension, create and verify your account, and connect an available browser ChatGPT session. The Free plan includes 25 user-started automation tasks per calendar month, shared across tools. Ordinary browser Chat is separate; provider limits apply.

Learn about shared context in our privacy policy and choosing Chat or Task.

FROM A PROMPT TO YOUR OWN WORK

Bring the task to your page.

Install WebAct, add your source material and make the result yours.

Install WebAct