How to use the Content Gap Analyzer.
A gap is useful only when it matters to your audience and expertise. A competitor's topic is not automatically a topic your site should publish.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Compare recurring audience questions with the material your site already covers. Prioritize missing answers you can demonstrate with evidence, identifying the intended reader and existing page that would connect to the new content.
- What you provide
- Own content inventory and supplied competitor pages.
- What you get
- Missing topics with evidence and proposed coverage.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Your help center covers setup; customer questions repeatedly ask about CSV errors.
Completed example
Consider a CSV troubleshooting guide, with examples drawn from those recurring questions.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Should every competitor topic become a content gap?
No. Include it only when it serves your audience and fits your expertise. Competitor coverage alone does not justify a new page.
Why does the gap list duplicate existing articles?
Compare the proposed answer with the actual content, not only titles. Extend a suitable page when it already serves the same need.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑