How to use the LinkedIn Recommendation Generator.
Write from actual collaboration. A specific observation is more credible than broad claims that the person is the best in their field.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Describe how you worked together and choose a behavior you directly observed. Explain its effect on the work, keeping praise specific enough that you could answer a follow-up question about it.
- What you provide
- Verified collaboration and achievements.
- What you get
- Specific recommendation grounded in firsthand details.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
You worked with Priya on a difficult release handoff.
Completed example
Priya kept the release handoff clear by documenting open issues and owners, which helped our team coordinate the remaining work.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Can a recommendation describe skills I did not observe?
Limit the endorsement to what you know, or clearly attribute reported information. Avoid implying firsthand knowledge you do not have.
Why does the recommendation sound interchangeable between colleagues?
Add the project context and a concrete action. Specific collaboration evidence distinguishes the person more clearly than superlatives.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑