How to use the Grant Application Coverage Checker.
A grant coverage check should map each application requirement to evidence in the draft. Mark partial answers and missing attachments explicitly instead of treating a mention of a topic as a complete response.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Break application instructions into individually checkable requirements and map each to a draft passage or attachment. Classify coverage as complete, partial, missing or unclear, explaining the evidence. Check whether the response actually answers the question rather than merely mentioning the topic.
- What you provide
- Application draft and funder criteria.
- What you get
- Missing required answers, attachments and evidence.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Guidelines require project timeline and evaluation plan. Draft includes dates but no measurement method.
Completed example
Timeline: covered by the dated activity section. Evaluation plan: missing. Add measures, collection timing and responsible roles, then check the required attachments separately.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Does mentioning evaluation establish that an evaluation-plan requirement is covered?
No. Check whether the required measures, timing and responsibilities are supplied at the requested level of detail.
Why does a complete narrative still fail the coverage check?
Mandatory forms, signatures or attachments may be separate requirements. Include them in the requirement map.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑