How to use the Ad Policy Wording Reviewer.
Review against the policy text supplied for the actual platform. A wording check cannot certify that an account or campaign will be approved.
Make the workflow fit your task.
Supply the applicable policy passage and compare the draft's exact claims against it. Record the relevant rule, the wording at issue and a narrower factual alternative, leaving approval decisions to the platform's actual process.
- What you provide
- Ad draft and supplied platform policy.
- What you get
- Potential wording conflicts with cited policy passages.
See the input and the result.
Illustrative input and output · a teaching example, not a live WebAct run
Example input
Supplied campaign rule: Do not promise guaranteed performance improvements without supporting evidence. Draft: Guaranteed to double your sales. Product fact: compares two supplied supplier catalogs.
Completed example
Issue: Guaranteed to double your sales promises an unsupported performance outcome. Applicable supplied rule: performance guarantees require supporting evidence. Suggested wording: Compare supplier catalogs and review the prices that changed. Review scope: the supplied wording and rule; this does not certify platform approval.
Load this input into the prompt, then copy it to WebAct to try the task. Your result may differ from the illustration.
Decisions and troubleshooting.
Can a wording review certify that an ad will be approved?
No. It can identify issues against the supplied rules, but account context, destination content and platform review may also matter.
Why does the proposed fix still violate the supplied rule?
Check whether it changes only tone while preserving the prohibited claim. Revise the substance rather than substituting a softer adjective.
Try it with your own source.
Replace the example with your material in the task prompt. Keep the requirements you need, then copy the task into WebAct.
Customize and copy the task ↑