Logical Fallacy Checker — illustrative example

INPUT
Evaluate the reasoning: The proposal is wrong because its author is inexperienced.

RESULT
Reasoning issue: the argument rejects the proposal based on the author's experience without evaluating its evidence or content. This is an ad hominem-style objection in the supplied passage.
What remains open: the proposal could still be right or wrong; assess its actual merits separately.

REVIEW
A possible fallacy needs explanation in context. A label alone is not a rebuttal, and a weak argument does not prove its conclusion false.

This is a teaching example, not a live execution record.